Archive for December, 2011

Learning on synchronicity evolving

December 27th, 2011

 

As I am waiting for another powerful synchronicity and closing out the year on qualitative research, it seems a good opportunity to list a few of the learnings:

  1. Synchronicity is unexpected. It comes upon the observer at a time least expected, often surprising, and then, in reflection, one realizes that the timing is perfect
  2. It is clustered. They occur in small groupings, several in a given time period
  3. Meaningful but not immediately. It can take a while to figure out what it means
  4. Private. This is a blog combining recordings of synchronicity, personal reflections, and ideas about qualitative research.  However, my impression is that most synchronicity is almost too private and personal to reveal within a work blog, and some must remain unexplored to the general public.  While, market research can always be recorded and assimilated by anyone on a client team, confidentiality upheld of course
  5. Talking and writing about synchronicity increase it. Heightening awareness of even molecular meaningful coincidences augments their frequency and power, while ignoring, minimizing, or decreasing awareness cause coincidences to disappear.  It suggests that we live in an intelligent universe who responds when we note it and lets us alone when we stop paying attention
  6. Synchronicity is a relationship. It augurs a strong set of ties or union between the seen and the unseen, like the tip of a whale tail that arises momentarily in the middle of a vast ocean.  The whales are there but come up only sporadically…not in response to us but we see them because we are there looking for them or we come upon them unexpectedly
  7. Color. Synchronicity tends to be a visual phenomenon.  Although one may hear of it or describe it…yet the recording of it in visual language or with tools like photos or videos helps to acknowledge its presence and digest its meaning

 

When synchronicities seem to cease

December 26th, 2011

 

During this season in which research projects and holidays converge at a dizzying rate of demand and completion, it would appear as if events and circumstances that should have vast interconnections….should abound and increase.  Instead, I have found the opposite… that serendipity has actually decreased.

 

Perhaps I am too busy to notice.  Perhaps my observational skills have been focused on accomplishing market research purposes and I do not or have not had a chance to remain open to new data that does not fit a model of investigation or the cultural structure.

 

I post this news as I await a return of this once-exciting system of coincidences of meaning occurring frequently… in 2012.

 

How does one make serendipity and synchronicity return, increase, and develop?

 

What happened to it?